How to write a trade thesis
Last reviewed
A trade thesis is a short written statement, made before or at entry, of why this trade should work: what you see, what you expect to happen, and - most importantly - what would prove you wrong. Its purpose is not prediction. It is to make the decision inspectable later, so a review can separate "the idea was bad" from "the idea was fine and I abandoned it".
The four questions a thesis answers
- What is the setup? The specific, observable condition that made you look: a level reclaimed, a funding-rate extreme, a narrative with a catalyst date. “It looks bullish” is a feeling, not a setup.
- Why now? What makes this the moment rather than yesterday or next week. If nothing distinguishes now, the entry is impulse.
- What do you expect? The path you are paid on - a target zone, a time horizon, or both - stated concretely enough to be checked against what happened.
- What invalidates it? The price, event or elapsed time at which the idea is wrong and the position should be closed regardless of how it feels. A thesis without an invalidation is a hope with a position attached.
Add your confidence at the time of writing. Recording it lets a later review ask a sharper question than “did it win?” - namely whether your high-confidence ideas actually perform better than your low-confidence ones.
A hypothetical worked example
“Long SOL at 142. Setup: reclaimed a level that rejected price three times last month, on rising spot volume while perp funding is still flat - suggesting spot-led buying, not leverage. Expect a move toward 158–162 within two weeks. Invalidated by a daily close below 136, or by funding spiking while price stalls. Confidence: 6/10. Risk: 0.75R of the account.”
Every clause is checkable afterwards. If price closes at 137 and drifts for a month, the review can say precisely which part failed - the timing expectation - rather than filing the whole trade under “didn’t work”.
Common failure modes
- Writing it after the exit. Hindsight rewrites intent. A thesis is only evidence if it predates the outcome.
- Vagueness that cannot lose. “Expecting continuation if conditions hold” is compatible with every outcome and therefore teaches nothing.
- Moving the invalidation. If the review shows invalidations routinely edited after entry, that is one of the clearest and most fixable patterns a journal can surface.
- Length. A thesis is three to six sentences. If it takes a page, the idea is not yet clear enough to fund.
Closing the loop
The thesis is half of a pair; the other half is the post-trade review, where you grade how faithfully you executed the plan you wrote - a separate judgment from whether the trade made money. How to review your trades covers that half.